Fat of the Land

The Problems Of Science?

sciencerecipe

As much as I love Gary Taubes, and I love me some Gary Taubes, there is a logical inconsistency at the heart of his faith system, science. Let’s see if this article might shed some light

In denial: breast cancer establishment continues to reject abortion link

In the debate surrounding the purported link between abortion and breast cancer (ABC link), there has arisen a core of individuals whose demeanor can best be described as zealous. This group has all but abandoned the core scientific principle of allowing themselves to be led, without prejudice, by the preponderance of the scientific data. It is a dangerous tack that they have taken for as scientists we are trained in a method that is meant to protect us, and the public who listen to our informed opinion, from the errors that come with thinking not in empirical terms, but from hewing to outmoded orthodoxies.

Scientists and physicians fall into this error time and again, which precludes being open to new information. Currently the abortion breast cancer debate swirling in Australia as one of the chief proponents of this link (Dr. Angela Lanfranchi) is there to give a presentation on the topic. This debate provides us a window into this issue of orthodoxies creeping into the scientific community and taking stubborn hold. (snip)

When a woman becomes pregnant her estrogen levels increase 2,000 times greater than baseline. The immediate effect is a swelling of breast tissue as the number of ductal cells roughly double. These cells are immature, undifferentiated, and cancer-prone. In the latter part of the second trimester and during the third trimester human placental lactogen is produced by the placenta, which matures and differentiates about 85% of the breast tissue from the cancer-prone Type 1 and Type 2 cells to milk producing and cancer resistant Type 3 and Type 4 cells. With breast-feeding and successive pregnancies the remaining 15% of cells are successively transformed to cancer resistant cells.

This is not only true in humans, but has been repeatedly demonstrated in animal models as well.

These facts are not in dispute by either side. Neither are the data showing that women who suffer first trimester miscarriage have no increased risk of breast cancer compared to women who have induced abortion, as their hormone levels never really increase appreciably. Neither in dispute are the data that demonstrate the earlier a woman has a first full term pregnancy, the lower her risk for breast cancer. Neither are the data by Danish epidemiologist Dr. Mads Melbye who discovered a 3% increased risk of breast cancer for every week after week seven of gestation where women have an induced abortion. He found an 89% increased risk of breast cancer after week eighteen in women who have had induced abortions. Melbye, it must be noted, denies the validity of his own statistically significant data.

Let that sink in for a moment. (snip)

Political orthodoxy has trumped the science and reason of hundreds of epidemiologists all over the globe, in scores of studies. Predictably the deniers will as a last resort point to the religious faith of some, suggesting that people of faith are incapable of adhering to the scientific method and discovering truth. Such orthodoxy prevents the funding by NCI of further studies along the ABC line of investigation, which only hurts women and their families in the long term.

The heart of science isn’t facts, it isn’t data and it isn’t research. It’s people. And contra Dawkins with his obsessive anti-religion mania a scientist isn’t a man with no religion, he’s a man with a different religion.

I challenge you to look, to really look at the Ancel Keys story. See what really happened and ask yourself how it could be prevented? Make all the rules you want and true believers such as Mr. Keys will blow through them like a house of cards. Because at the end of the day science is chock-a-block full of very smart people, some of whom have very poor ethics.

Can politics be removed from science? How about funding? How about beliefs such in the story above? Or, that fat is bad and carbs good?

At the end of the day the real problem with science is that it’s made out of fallen sinful human beings. And while their is a cure for that it is not to be found in the halls of academia.

This just in:

Low-Salt Diets May Pose Health Risks, Study Finds

Findings Are Latest Challenge to Benefits of Aggressively Low Sodium Targets

Buh-buh-buh…science!

This is my whole point in a nutshell. Whatever lunatic can get their sweaty, crazed hands on the megaphone apparently wins the day. And how do you stop that?

Lots more very good stuff at that last link, read the whole thing!

You Need Pharmaceuticals to Lose Weight…

…says CEO of Pharmaceutical company developing weight loss drug.

Quelle surprise!

Tom Hughes wants to change the way you think about obesity.

As the chief executive officer of Zafgen, a company developing a weight-loss medicine that went public in June, he has reason to. But he argues the evidence just doesn’t stack up to support the idea that diet and exercise can effectively reverse obesity.

As someone who has successfully lost weight — not to mention getting my blood sugars under control while getting off pills and insulin injections — my first question is this: What evidence? Secondly, I’d like to know if the subjects were trying to lose weight using the same bogus nutritional advice I received from the medical world.

bullshit

Instead of struggling with a doctor-recommended, government-approved diet that axes the fat and insists on hearthealthywholegrains aplenty, go low carb high fat And forget about doing your part to prop up the pharmaceutical industry altogether.

Comments under this piece were lively and numerous. I was pleased to see at least a few of the readers getting it right…and saying so.

keto comment

^^^ What she said. ^^^

Cutting Salt May Do More Harm Than Good

I know it’s hard to believe that the medical community and government may have gotten something dietary wrong.

clown

A long-running debate over the merits of eating less salt escalated Wednesday when one of the most comprehensive studies yet suggested cutting back on sodium too much actually poses health hazards.

Current guidelines from U.S. government agencies, the World Health Organization, the American Heart Association and other groups set daily dietary sodium targets between 1,500 and 2,300 milligrams or lower, well below the average U.S. daily consumption of about 3,400 milligrams.

The new study, which tracked more than 100,000 people from 17 countries over an average of more than three years, found that those who consumed fewer than 3,000 milligrams of sodium a day had a 27% higher risk of death or a serious event such as a heart attack or stroke in that period than those whose intake was estimated at 3,000 to 6,000 milligrams. Risk of death or other major events increased with intake above 6,000 milligrams.

Now, the study was observational, meaning that the findings about low sodium intake show association rather than causation. But, given the track record of the medical community’s recommendations (eating carbs to lose weight, putting diabetics who produce too much insulin on shots of insulin, prescribing statins to almost anyone), I’m more than happy to take their advice with, well, a grain of salt.

Maybe quite a few grains of salt.

Salt by Salt Shaker   Original Filename: 6507-000073.jpg

Fatkini?

A disturbing trend has emerged on Twitter — #FATKINI. Evidently a slew of young women are taking selfies of their variously sized (mostly overweight) bodies and posting them to Twitter in an effort to stop “fat shaming” and promote pride in fat bodies.

fatkini

The debate rages on about whether or not this is a good thing. Given a few of the other hashtags I’ve seen in response — most notable #LOSEHATENOTWEIGHT — I’m going with not. There’s a big difference between being ashamed to go out in public vs. accepting the reality of your own shape and size. There’s an even bigger difference between discouraging ostracism and encouraging people who are unhealthy to NOT lose weight.

How about focusing a lot less on how we look — and what others think about that — and a lot more on being healthy and feeling good from the inside out? Given our obsession with looks and how others perceive us, I’m not holding my breath that there will be a mass realization that what’s really needed is for people to put down the sugar and wheat, and pick up the eggs and bacon.

But a girl can dream.

Until then, I’ll keep my fingers crossed for the next hashtag trend to be #FITKINI.

Kids Tweet Displeasure Over “Healthy” Vending Machines at School

Remember when, earlier this year, high school students were tweeting the First Lady to protest the “meanwiches & stinkburgers” they were being served up based on her new school menu guidelines? Send in the vending machines.

Obama u ruined vending machines

dollar store b4 school

rip vending machine tweet

Read ‘em all for a good laugh. *LANGUAGE WARNING!*

Herb-Crusted Pork Loin

Herb-Crusted Pork Loin

Herb-Crusted Pork Loin

Ingredients

one pork loin, 3-4 pounds

2 tbsp. dried basil

1 tbsp. dried oregano

1 tbsp. dried parsley

1 tsp. onion powder

1/2 tsp. garlic powder

1/2 tsp. salt

1/2 tsp. black pepper

Instructions

Preheat oven to 350 degrees.

Rinse and pat dry pork loin. Combine rest of ingredients and mix well (shaking in a small container with a snap-on lid works well). Rub herb mixture onto surface of pork loin, making sure that it adheres well and that all surfaces are covered.

Place pork loin in roasting pan and roast until internal temperature reaches 145 degrees (about 20 minutes per pound). Remove from oven and rest pork loin until temperature climbs to 160 degrees. Slice and serve.

Schema/Recipe SEO Data Markup by ZipList Recipe Plugin
http://www.fatoftheland.us/2014/08/11/herb-crusted-pork-loin/

You Do the Math

meat and eggs

Pretty much everyone is feeling the squeeze these days. Only the nation’s wealthiest individuals can absorb the rising cost of pretty much everything without too much suffering.

But Ben Domenech over at The Federalist noticed which prices are rising the most steeply, and brings up an interesting question: Why?

Today’s economy is driven by Washington in more than just determining the location of Maserati dealerships. We see the ramifications of current government policies in numerous obvious ways. Make full-time employment more expensive with required benefits, and suddenly there are more part-time jobs; provide ample benefits and low eligibility standards for defining disabled workers, and suddenly there are more long-term unemployed going on SSDI; keep interest rates at zero, and suddenly there are more elderly workers; end unemployment insurance, and suddenly you see people accepting jobs they were reluctant to take; and as we’ve seen at the state and local level, raise the minimum wage, and suddenly teens are struggling to find work.

Those are the economic basics. So how has that translated to economic reality for working Americans?

food vs wages 2009-2014 chart

Domenech rightly notes that while Washington is busy being concerned with special interest groups like farm, energy and trade, regular folks like you and me are more worried about the immediate need to provide our families with a heated and cooled home, food, and health care. But to quote filmmaker Craig Bodecker…“Do you see the disconnect?”

And as an avid LCHF eater, I can’t help but notice which foods’ prices are climbing most rapidly: those that I eat the most, but that populate the smallest portion of the government’s MyPlate recommendations, the new-and-improved version of the vegetarian-driven Food Pyramid: meat, meat, meat, eggs, and meat. What about the grains and vegetables the government’s misinformed (to be generous) guidelines for good health encourage?

But prices for cereals and bakery products were up just 0.1% and vegetable prices inched up only 0.5%.

Methinks something smells fishy here. The odor seems to be drifting our way from Washington. And the fishier it gets, the less we can afford to eat it.

Most People Don’t Get It

paleo-meal

But you can. Dentist Alvin Danenberg describes why, at long last, he did.

It took 66 years for me to begin learning the most significant thing that changed the quality of my life. What I learned almost two years ago is still relatively unknown by the vast majority of people and their physicians in the United States. Sadly, most people are slowly killing themselves without their knowledge. These people truly believe they are doing what is best for them, but they are doing the exact opposite. They follow diets that are flawed; they are eating foods that are inconspicuously tainted; and they take medicines that do more harm than good. Most people don’t get it.

For many years I had been actively exercising, eating whole grains, avoiding saturated fat, and taking various medications to control some of my bad blood chemistries. I had to always watch what I was eating because I would gain weight as soon as I deviated from a strict program. And it was getting harder and harder as I was getting older and older. Very frustrating.

Read it all. Dr. Danenberg will take you on a trip through the animals of the wild to a remote, primitive island where the natives have avoided the explosion of “lifestyle diseases” that fill our headlines today.

To break out of the health trap in which most of us are entwined, we need to avoid toxins that get into our bodies, and we need to ingest the foods that our bodies are designed to use for growth and energy. Avoiding toxins would mean buying foods that are not contaminated with fertilizers and hormones, and are free of preservatives and other artificial additives. Getting the right food would consist of eating fresh vegetables, fruit, nuts, seeds, and pasture-raised or wild-caught animal products.

Dr. Danenberg doesn’t specifically advocate for a ketogenic diet like the BiblioDiet, but for its kissin’ cousin, the Paleo diet. But he gets it…and you should too!

Big Brother Bans Bake Sale Brownies

bake-sale

Goodbye goodies…adios $$$.

At Chapman School in Nebraska, resourceful students hawk pizza and cookie dough to raise money for school supplies, field trips and an eighth-grade excursion to Washington. They peddle chocolate bars to help fund the yearbook.

But the sales won’t be so sweet starting this fall. Campus bake sales—a mainstay of school fundraisers—are going on a diet. A federal law that aims to curb childhood obesity means that, in dozens of states, bake sales must adhere to nutrition requirements that could replace cupcakes and brownies with fruit cups and granola bars.

Don’t pack your bags — or even your backpacks — yet, kids. Unless, of course, you’ve got some magic way to get your classmates pumped up to spend their precious allowances and birthday cash on fruit cups and granola bars. I’ll be over here, waiting, and not holding my breath.

The restrictions that took effect in July stem from the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act championed by first lady Michelle Obama and her “Let’s Move!” campaign. The law overhauled nutrition standards affecting more than 30 million children. Among the changes: fatty french fries were out, while baked sweet potato fries were deemed to be fine.

The law also required the U.S. Department of Agriculture to set standards for all food and beverages sold during the school day, which includes vending machines, snack carts and daytime fundraisers. It allowed for “infrequent” fundraisers, and states were allowed to decide how many bake sales they would have that didn’t meet nutrition standards.

Without state-approved exemptions, any treats sold would have to meet calorie, sodium, fat and other requirements. The law permits states to fine schools that don’t comply.

I’m no cheerleader for any of the food the law banned — from french fries to cupcakes. I also believe the kids, with input from their parents, should be able to choose what they eat for lunch, snacks, and in support of school programs.

But never forget that those tasked with deciding what is and is not “allowed” in schools are the same ones who brought us the Food Pyramid and now MyPlate. And sugar will make you fat. But not just the granular white stuff — ANYTHING that turns into glucose once it hits your system — in other words, anything that’s high in carbs.

So, looking at the carbs in the foods in question, what magic will these government-mandated changes bring to schools across America?

Big Brother Bake Sale Carbs

Not much — and while the cupcake will provide the largest blood sugar spike, the new & approved granola bars come in an easy second. So much for looking out for our kids.

dunkin frowny donut